From alemay@redhat.com Wed Nov 1 11:14:12 2017 Received: from mail-ua0-f170.google.com (mail-ua0-f170.google.com [209.85.217.170]) by underdog.stansell.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id vA1BE9C6006462 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:14:11 GMT Received: by mail-ua0-f170.google.com with SMTP id i35so1282478uah.9 for ; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 04:14:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=N+SEg2b4GJAgrq3Fsa0maaACdbWYEwU0ITEOSgDUk00=; b=AN0aycjgKZ6uHhXfwewFDFRs0H34xwVYr2zd1zpJQyZ+GOxSD8fzQbEr4DGeZhQJVh PVluICDzrebZBq+BKxMiNM/U8OXu6mX9Pcl0TUL9VQ/Pf/Ik9Erv8ityFBJrC0WAHEAS YuMy9ZjXnKc1XHj1yDO6LnQCck7kOIXKao+OMylGjWJicNEn2k5wjJAbQHj9xvMzq8fv r6LqfbHGp7blAYJ4qa5eaRZzBpVqTE/lTU9sLse31QysPBYNjKiy5a+NUwutMOoGHXw0 FxIVdSjRBKlY7fgueEjmMQZjL6sf3kZEhzUs6SfMOu9udfnJ3i0JYiMpI0HHKtKHumN5 pB1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVk32Jb0WbJ7tPOfRHAwrR59mX5J2/r5oShcKSs7c/O0qRxqaFP 2QCH0aYSMj8eNDxWyf6kt04a7M3XozLoCq45g95QMqrrQvY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+T3a+mrp6jKsEs7EpFGJed0mqYj9dS/A2NcDLns9lOLBOu3KnyKwTcIbaYQ+i6Pd053ieIpU8Pan5dyZZ9zpxM= X-Received: by 10.159.32.133 with SMTP id 5mr4364581uaa.61.1509534848679; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 04:14:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.74.214 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 04:14:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Lemay Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 07:14:08 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Anyone using conserver on RHEL7 To: users@conserver.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: -1.9 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 198.151.248.21 X-BeenThere: users@conserver.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Conserver Users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:14:12 -0000 Hello, Just curious if anyone is using conserver on RHEL7 and is using systemctl reload conserver to pull in new changes? Currently doing a reload fails. Just setup a test box and noticed that's no longer working like on RHEL6 RHEL 6 [root@conserver-02 ~]# conserver -V conserver: conserver.com version 8.1.18 RHEL7 [root@conserver-02 ~]# conserver -V conserver: conserver.com version 8.2.0 Thanks any feedback would be great. -- -- Andrew Lemay GPG 140436D1 (8BC3 5F0F C268 8618 61AA 0B8A 8031 5527 1404 36D1) Systems Administrator, PnT DevOps Labs & Capital Management alemay@redhat.com 978.392.3935 From nstraz@redhat.com Wed Nov 1 16:03:07 2017 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by underdog.stansell.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id vA1G34Ow011700 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 16:03:06 GMT Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32A34A63E3 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 16:03:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 32A34A63E3 Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nstraz@redhat.com Received: from weekend (ovpn-122-120.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.122.120]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C17C846E65 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 16:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by weekend (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:03:01 -0500 From: "Nathan Straz" Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:03:01 -0500 To: users@conserver.com Subject: Re: Anyone using conserver on RHEL7 Message-ID: <20171101160301.GA1996@redhat.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 198.151.248.21 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Wed, 01 Nov 2017 16:03:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Score: 0.798 () BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-BeenThere: users@conserver.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Conserver Users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 16:03:08 -0000 On Nov 1 07:14, Andrew Lemay via users wrote: > Just curious if anyone is using conserver on RHEL7 and is using > systemctl reload conserver to pull in new changes? > > Currently doing a reload fails. We are using conserver on some RHEL7 servers, but they rarely need a reconfig after we set them up. I looked at the systemd unit file and ExecReload is not defined, so reloads will probably fail. While getting them working, I think I just stopped and started the service. Looking at the systemd.service man page, it looks like using signals is frowned upon but still available. Something like ExecReload=/bin/kill -HUP $MAINPID should still work. There's a possibility of using a console zap but I think that would require some non-default configuration. # console -M localhost -z reconfig 127.0.0.1: unauthorized command Nate Straz Cluster QE - GFS2 Red Hat