Re: Sun alternate break

> RE: Sun alternate breakWhat I meant was, does applying that patch require
> anything special to be done to conserver, or does the Solaris kernel for
> that client understand the break from conserver and interpret it correctly?
> I didn't want to patch conserver so that all machines it manages now have to
> make use of that alternate break.  Only one machine might be set up like
> that, so that machine should still be "breakable", just not from those
> inadvertent disconnects.
> 
any suns which are patched should ignore any breaks sent via the conserver menu
( l1) but will halt if you type ~^b (quickly)at the terminal session. So you 
can use it without changing conserver, you just have to remember ~^b.



> Ernie


-- 
Iain Rae			Tel:01316505202	
Computing Officer		JCMB:2148
Division of Informatics
The University of Edinburgh